Jump to content

Talk:D. B. Cooper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleD. B. Cooper is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 30, 2008.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 24, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
March 3, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 24, 2005, November 24, 2006, November 24, 2008, November 24, 2009, November 24, 2010, November 24, 2021, and November 24, 2022.
Current status: Former featured article

Listen to this page (40 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this page dated 29 May 2008 (2008-05-29), and does not reflect subsequent edits.

I am DB Cooper (2022) movie

[edit]

Prime video. Reference add to movie and book references. 76.135.165.25 (talk) 06:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@76.135.165.25: Movie and book references belong on D. B. Cooper in popular culture. Fabrickator (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnamed people: DB Cooper

[edit]

Can you put DB Cooper as an unnamed person? We don't know who he is. 2603:6080:6803:54C4:2A8C:F2CE:CCC4:6B9D (talk) 19:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is this?

[edit]

"In 1980, Braden was indicted by a Federal grand jury for driving an 18-wheeler full of stolen goods from Arizona to Massachusetts, but it is unknown whether there was a conviction in that case."

How is it unknown? Either he was charged and convicted, in which case there is a record, he was charged and _not_ convicted, in which case there is a record, or this is hearsay and shouldn't be in the article at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstar3k (talkcontribs) 00:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update as of Nov. 2024

[edit]

Shouldn't we add information regarding the secret parachute that may have finally solved the question of D. B. Cooper's identity, which was covered by the mainstream media in late November 2024? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 22:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done
"finally solved" is putting it very strongly, but I've added the recent events to the section on Richard McCoy Jr. ApLundell (talk) 02:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I have toned it down a bit further - cited source does not say the parachute was similar to the ones from either of the two hijackings in question. (talk) 08:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A bunch of news outlets are quoting experts, usually Dan Gryder whoever he is, that it's "identical" to one of Cooper's four parachutes.(example) I summarized all the sources I read, but only cited one of them. My bad.
Still, you can tell from the fact that I toned down "identical" and "one in a billion" to 'similar' that I'm dubious until an actual forensics expert weighs in. We don't want to give this kind of stuff undue weight.
A lot of people stand to make money by attaching themselves to this case, so any new evidence should be treated with skepticism. ApLundell (talk) 18:34, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The reception online by D. B. Cooper researchers seems overwhelmingly skeptical, including a video debunking Gryder's claims, so I agree it's worth avoiding repeating the details of Gryder's claims about the parachute until experts have confirmed this (and also assertions of FBI involvement which might appear to lend credibility, despite them not having made any comment). --YodinT 20:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated citations

[edit]

Just wanted to note that most of the "duplicate" citations cited in the newly-added header template are separate citations because they have distinct |quote= fields which pull different excerpts from the same page of a report. I'm not sure what the correct way to resolve this issue is. Can all citations to, say, p64 of the FBI report be combined under one named reference while preserving separate quotes? I don't know how this would be done. -- Iritscen (talk) 03:13, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Itdoesntmatteranymore took care of this the day after my question, so never mind. --Iritscen (talk) 02:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]